business ownership Archives - Page 2 of 27

Is your business too dependent on you?

December 13, 2024May 30, 2024 by Michael Jones

By definition, a small business depends on you, its owner. Especially if you are its original founder. After all, the business would never have existed without the leap you took to start it in the first place. It wouldn’t have survived it’s early years without the sweat, tears and sacrifices, financial and otherwise, that were made.

Likely it survived and went on to flourish because of some special knowledge, skills or traits you either already had when you began, or that you developed while building it into the successful enterprise it has become. The value that you brought to the table in the beginning was your company’s most precious asset, and is likely still valuable today.

However, if your company is too dependent you, then it’s probably not operating as efficiently as it could. Put another way, If you are your company’s greatest asset, then you could also very well be its biggest liability. Owner dependence can be an obstacle for growth and hurt a company’s value when the time comes to sell.

Degrees of owner dependence

Owner dependence comes in many different forms. Does the business rely on you for most or all of its sales? Are you the go-to person for a key skill or necessary knowledge? Are you required to review others’ work and sign-off because you hold the required license? Are you still doing the bookkeeping or payroll?

Even if not involved in the daily operations, there are other ways a business could be owner-centric. Are you the only one who brings new ideas for growth? What business decisions are you responsible for? In what areas does your management team need your approval before taking action?

There are various surveys available which can help identify how owner-centric a business is; we offer one that takes less than 15 minutes to complete. Here’s another way to get a basic idea of owner-centricity that takes only a few seconds. How much time did you spend ‘touching base’ with your company during your last vacation? If you’re not sure, I’ll bet your spouse knows.

Too much dependence = less value

A business too dependent on its owner can make it more difficult to sell and even reduce its value. If a potential external or internal buyer (if you plan on selling to key employees) can’t fill your shoes, then they must either hire talent to replace the lost skillset, or keep you on for an extended time to help with the transition. Adding headcount means less profit and therefore less value. An extended transition means more risk to the buyer, (what if the business can’t be as successful without you) which again makes it less valuable.

Even if you don’t plan on selling any time soon, getting the business less dependent on you can provide value in other ways. How much would it be worth to you if you could spend 10 less hours a week at work? What would it mean to those you cared about if you had more time to spend with them? How would it feel if you could take 3 months off comfortably knowing that your company is humming along fine without you?

Some owners who have had this concept presented to them have reasons why they can’t take their fingerprints off the business. The most common ones are, “I’d love for the business to be less dependent on me, but I’m too busy to train someone else.” Or, “I’m involved in these areas because a mistake would be too expensive.” There’s also the classic “No one can do this as well as me!” These or other reasons could be challenges for you as well. I didn’t say this would be easy. On the other hand, owners that have been able to overcome these obstacles have created more business value and a better quality of life for themselves. And some who initially thought they wanted to sell had a change of heart. Once they found that the business wasn’t running them, ownership became enjoyable again and it was worth keeping.

Taking the first step

If this sounds like a worthwhile exercise, the first step is to identify the aspects of your business that are dependent on you. Then start small and pick one area to tackle first. Can it be delegated? Can it be systematized? Outsourced? Maybe some additional training is needed. Maybe someone with experience in that area should be hired.

Once you have the first one checked off, you should have more time and energy to tackle the next. It’s a virtuous cycle. Accomplish enough of these and not only will your company’s value increase, so will your quality of life.

Michael Jones, CFP, CEPA spent several years in management and engineering roles for various Fortune 500 companies. He has a B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech and an MBA from the Krannert School at Purdue University. He is the President of Ataraxia Advisory Services, LLC.

Why You Can’t Sell Your Business Overnight

March 20, 2024 by Mark C. Hegstrom

So why can’t you just sell your business in a couple of months?

Business owners are often told they need to get ready to sell their business, why can’t they just up and sell it? The short answer is that they are unlikely to sell it. Listing the business may be easy, getting someone to buy it, that’s the hard part. According to the Exit Planning Institute, only some 20-30% of businesses sell today.

You might be asking yourself, what actually makes a business part of this group who does sell?

Of course, there may be many answers to this question, but I think the biggest reason can be summed up in a single word: Risk. A business buyer is going to look at several factors when determining if they will buy. These factors lead them to conclude a risk level and they compare that with their tolerance for accepting risk. The higher the perceived risk, often there is a direct correlation with a lower multiple of EBITDA, and thus a lower selling price. In some cases, the risk perception may be so high that the buyer decides there is no price they would pay to accept that risk.

What are some of these perceived risks?

I think for a lot of small and lower middle market businesses, the challenges for a successful sale to an outside party are greater than for larger companies. Larger companies are larger because they sell more products – they need more inputs to sell a larger amount of their product. They need people, processes and management. Usually in a larger organization, the owner is not participating directly in the production or sales of the product, they have an organization that does this. Contrast this image with a smaller company where the owner is directly involved in the production of the product or sales – the greater this involvement, the greater the perceived reliance on the owner. We call this “owner centricity.” The higher the owner centricity, the riskier the proposition is to an outside buyer.

If the current owner is deeply active in production, sales or the management of the firm, then an outside buyer will have to replace those functions – they may conclude they will have to do these activities, and there is the rub. They may or may not want to do them, but perhaps more important, they may not perceive that they are able to do those functions. An owner who knows all his customers, an owner who is a gregarious personality and is responsible for attracting new business, an owner who has been at it for decades and knows the industry, the suppliers, the competition – those are all critical owner functions – the problem is that a new owner may not be able to see themselves doing those activities with the same success as someone who has done it for years. If the prospective buyer can’t see themselves as being able to do these functions as well, then they will question whether the business can repeat the sales and profits earned by the original owner. The degree to which this idea is challenged is risk.

A way to reduce this risk might be to reduce the level of owner centricity. To reduce the level of owner centricity, an owner would assess the critical functions of the business and measure the extent of their involvement. Once measured, the owner would undertake the process of implementing a management succession plan to develop written procedures, systems and policies, and begin the methodical process of handing over or delegating the owner’s responsibilities.

I like to think of a business as a mental model that fits inside of a shoebox. The box has systems, policies and procedures, that runs itself. It produces a repeatable process of making money. Imagine that one could reach inside that box and pulls the owner out! Now the owner owns the box that produces the repeatable product and earns a predictable profit. I recently met with a business owner client who shared that he had taken our advice and told his staff that he is no longer coming into the office. (His words were “only call me if someone dies”!) What he found was that the business ran without him, it produced recurring and repeatable revenue and profit streams. A new buyer might perceive that they can own that box, and they may then perceive it as less risky.

Exit, succession and continuity planning is about this process. Reducing owner centricity is one thing an owner can do to prepare for a sale or exit. This is not a quick fix, this takes time. Those who develop and implement an exit and succession plan over time may be able to reduce the perceived risks to a new buyer. You might say, those with a plan have a better chance of selling their business than those without a plan.

Mark Hegstrom is Certified Exit Planning Advisor and helps business owners to plan for what may be their single largest lifetime transaction: the transfer of their business. Get started by completing an exit readiness Assessment for yourself. Mark is Managing Partner at Business Owner Succession Strategies (BOSS). He currently serves as President of the Exit Planning Institute -Twin Cities Chapter.

Personal Vision – Life After the Sale Part 2

February 26, 2024 by John F. Dini

In our last article about life after the sale we discussed identity. Even when business owners are comfortable with who they are, however, there is still the nuts and bolts issue of activity.

A business owner spends 20, 30, or (not uncommonly with Boomers,) 40 years focused on running a business. Unless they’ve built a substantial organization that is run by employees, it likely remains their biggest single time commitment right up until they leave. That commitment is frequently a lot more than 40 hours.

Even if the time “in the office” or “on the job” is less than 40 hours, there are the emails before and after hours, the texts, phone calls from unhappy customers or from employees who aren’t going to make it to work, and just thinking about what comes next, frequently at 2 o’clock in the morning.

Extended Vacation

When asked about activities to fill their week, many owners will say “I’ll have plenty to do!” That isn’t enough. “Plenty” requires some planning if it is really going to occupy the bulk of their work week.

After exiting a business, most owners bask in their newfound freedom. If we presume a selling price that’s substantial enough to allow them a wide range of choices, their first reactions typically include a few lengthy trips. These may range from a long-promised European vacation with the spouse to purchasing an RV to tour the National Parks.

This extended vacation period usually ranges from six months to a year. After that, most owners are looking for something to do. Their grandchildren (and their grandchildren’s parents) are less enthusiastic about having Grandpa and Grandma around too frequently. Travel is too tiring to keep it up indefinitely. Friends are rarely in the same position. Either they are still working and lack the leisure time, or they’ve progressed beyond the extended vacation period and settled down into their own retirement routine.

And as astounding as it may sound to enthusiasts, I’ve heard “I never thought I could play too much golf,” any number of times.

Life After the Sale…and After the Vacation

We use an exercise that brings home just how much the business has dominated an owner’s life. It starts by asking the owner to think a year ahead.

We start with the owner’s “average” work week. Let’s say 50 hours for this example. Then we begin deducting those activities that comprise their impression of “plenty to do,” putting an hourly commitment to each activity.

Regular travel, either for relatives or recreation, still comes close to the top of the list. We ask “How about two weeks away every quarter?” The response is that eight weeks a year is a lot, but could be enjoyable. Then we do the math: 8 weeks x 50 hours= 400 hours of vacation, divided by 52 weeks = 7.7 hours a week. A good start, but we still have 42 hours to fill to replace the business.

How about fitness? Getting into shape is often a goal, but working out every weekday only absorbs another 5 hours.

Working for a cause such as serving lunch at the local homeless shelter a few days a week, can use up another 10-12 hours. We still have 25 hours to go, or about half the time currently spent working.

We can still fit in 18 holes twice a week. That’s 8 more hours. At this point, many owners run out of ideas. That still leaves 17 hours a week, or two full “normal” work days.

The objective isn’t to merely fill up the time slots. It’s to illustrate just how big a void needs to be filled to replace the business. Whether your exit is planned for a year from now or ten, it is time to begin thinking about life after the sale.

John F. Dini develops transition and succession strategies that allow business owners to exit their companies on their own schedule, with the proceeds they seek and complete control over the process. He takes a coaching approach to client engagements, focusing on helping owners of companies with $1M to $250M in revenue achieve both their desired lifestyles and legacies.

Exit Strategies – The Road Less Traveled

September 28, 2023 by John F. Dini

The road less traveled is often a misimpression when considering a transition from business ownership. Surveys show that roughly 85% of owners expect their exit to happen via a sale of the business to a third party.

A third-party sale is certainly attractive. The idea of monetizing decades of work in one lump-sum payoff seems equitable. Years of sacrificing to “invest in the business” is supposed to generate a return. “He (or she) sold the company” when applied to someone who is clearly enjoying a comfortable lifestyle in retirement acts as an advertisement for the benefits of cashing out.

Unfortunately, that isn’t only less frequent than assumed, but it’s so infrequent as to be close to a rarity.

The Numbers Don’t Lie

Baby Boomers owned businesses at about twice the rate of previous or succeeding generations. Franchising and an overcrowded job market for corporate careers drove about 6% of Boomers into entrepreneurship, where the traditional average for business ownership is closer to 3% of the population.

A decade ago, according to the SBA, about two-thirds of all businesses between 5 and 500 employees were owned by persons 48 years old or older. Today, just over half are owned by folks over the age of 58. That makes it pretty safe to extrapolate that around 4% of that age group still own businesses.

Census data puts the number of persons turning 65 years old at 10,000 a day, so it’s a decent guess to say that 400 of those, on average, probably own a business. That’s 2,800 a week, or about 140,000 a year. Not everyone exits when they hit 65, and almost 90% of those businesses employ fewer than 20 people.

For exit planning discussions, let’s divide the under and over-20 employee companies into two groups, which we will call “Main Street” and “Mid-market.” (Note- this is not a valid market definition of those two terms. For further explanation see the Afterword in my most recent work The Exit Planning Coach Handbook.”)

Main Street companies would then be 90% of our 140,000 owner population. That’s 126,000 businesses. According to the IBBA, Business Brokers sell about 8,000 Main Street companies annually, or about 20% of those they list. That leaves 92% of Main Street owners to find another way.

Of the 14,000 or so that we are classifying as Mid-Market, Private Equity activity accounts for about 6,000 transactions annually, many of which are handled by brokers. (So there is an unknown amount of double counting here.) The last two years saw a spike of about 50% in acquisitions due to low interest rates, but it is safe to say that at least a third of these presumably very desirable middle-market businesses have to find an alternative exit plan.

Advisors Ignore the Numbers

With these statistics, why do owners and their advisors continue to focus on exit strategies that only work for a small minority? The higher visibility of transactions is part of the bias, as are the higher professional fees that they generate, but the biggest issue is a lack of advisor education.

Advisors who work with owners approaching a transaction have an obligation to inform them of their options. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. We survey the exit planning industry annually. Only between 5,000 and 6,000 advisors claim exit planning as an offered service. That’s an advisor-to-owner ratio of 23:1 each year. If we consider the entire remaining population of Boomer-owned employers, that ratio is five hundred to one.

Most owners have 50% of more of their personal net worth in the business. Yet we continue to see financial planners who base their clients’ retirement calculations on an unconfirmed estimate of what the company will contribute via a third-party sale, when such a sale may be the least likely outcome. A financial plan for a business owner cannot be holistic if it doesn’t consider 50% of his assets.

Attorneys and accountants frequently report that the first time they interact with a client about exiting is when a purchase offer is already on the table. Proactive discussions about eventual transfer or succession are usually brief, and cease when the client says “I’m not ready yet.” They let their clients postpone the discussion until circumstance or happenstance intervenes.

Business Brokers, of course, only talk to clients who have already decided on their preferred course of action. As a former Certified Business Intermediary, I can say from experience that unfortunately, most have no alternative for the 80% of listings they can’t sell.

The Road Less Traveled

The truth is, despite popular conceptions to the contrary, sales to third parties are the road less traveled. Certainly, many lifestyle businesses are really jobs and have to close when the founder/owner/CEO retires. Many others, however, could recoup the owner’s investment with a structured transfer to employees.

Given a few years, most owners could hire and train a suitable buyer. That usually requires support, since few have experience in recruiting and teaching someone to do what they do. There is also some education involved to help the owner understand how investing in a top-flight employee today can pay huge dividends in the future.

Additionally, there is the issue of owners who believe that they have to keep any rumor of their impending retirement from others in their industry. Customers, vendors and competitors are a fertile market for acquirers. A good advisor can act to maintain confidentiality when putting out feelers.

Advisors need to be more proactive in approaching clients about their objectives and their options. Initiating a structured conversation around both is in the best interest of the client and the advisor. They may choose to avoid the road less traveled.

The Role of a Coach in Exit Planning

July 5, 2023May 23, 2023 by John F. Dini

Defining the role of a coach on your exit planning team doesn’t just happen. Like any other aspect of working with consultants, you need to set expectations upfront.

Many advisors like to characterize themselves as the “quarterback” of a transition planning team. I’ve always objected to that. We regard the business owner as the quarterback of the planning process. After all, the coach never gets sacked by a 300-pound defensive lineman. The advisor may want to win every bit as much as the business owner, but it’s the owner who actually has skin in the game.

A Coach’s Responsibilities

It’s one thing to say that you are a coach and another to act like it. Here are seven basic rules an owner should expect from the coach on a planning team.

He (or she) speaks the truth always, even (or especially) if you don’t particularly want to hear it.
He must act as a Fiduciary, putting your needs first.
He should offer options and alternatives, especially when you have a fixed idea of how things need to be done.
He acts as the defender of your objectives and points out when other advisors on the team are drifting from those objectives.
He documents the progress of your engagement, as well as that of the other advisors.
He respects the work of other advisors and solicits their input.
He delivers your contributions on schedule, but respects your need to attend to business first.

role of a coach These “rules” can be verbalized or set out in writing, but it is important that your expectations are discussed at the outset.

Let’s continue with the coaching analogy for a moment. The quarterback must not only accept the coach’s advice, but in his role as leader of the team he should be telling the position players that his plays are the ones they are going to use. The quarterback understands that the route assigned to the wide receiver is only part of the picture. There are other men that are going to protect him so he has time to throw, or occupy defenders so the receiver can get open. The pieces have to work together as a whole.

Leading a Team

Similarly, the business owner must make plain that the coach’s responsibility includes overseeing the other members of the advisory team. No receiver would dream of coming into the huddle and saying “Hey guys. I just thought up a different play. Here’s what I want you all to do.” Some advisors, however, seem to think that is OK.

But if the receiver comes to the quarterback while the offense is on the sidelines and says “They are using the same coverage on me every time. I think I have an opportunity down the sideline,” it’s the quarterback’s role (and obligation) to bring that to the coach. Then an appropriate play can be drawn up that involves the entire team. Similarly, you should be open to other advisors’ input, but bring it to the coach right away.

Every team needs a coach. It’s his or her responsibility to help them work together for a single outcome. It’s not your job as an owner. You have neither the experience nor the time to devote to the task. Defining the role of a coach leaves you, the quarterback, the ability to focus on winning the game.