Exit Planning Tools for Business Owners

employees

Manage Activities; Lead for Results

by

A few weeks ago I posted a comment in the Business Journals Leadership Trust Forum about a life lesson I learned. The difference between effort and outcomes – Manage Activities; Lead for Results.

They reached out and asked if I could expand my comments a bit. Those of you who know me won’t find it surprising that it grew into an article.

You can find it here. I hope you enjoy it. Remember, lead for results.

 
Invest 15 Minutes and take our FREE Exit Readiness Assessment. We do not request any confidential information.

John F. Dini develops transition and succession strategies that allow business owners to exit their companies on their own schedule, with the proceeds they seek and complete control over the process. He takes a coaching approach to client engagements, focusing on helping owners of companies with $1M to $250M in revenue achieve both their desired lifestyles and legacies

Is Google Making Us Stoopid?

by

As an Exit Planner, most of my engagements involve assessing a management team. They may be the intended buyers of the company, or else they are key factors in the saleability of the business.

The biggest and most frequent complaint I hear about managers is that they don’t know how to THINK. Business owners lament the inability of employees to discern critical paths, assess alternatives, or analyze complex problems.

Examples of Thinking Shortfalls

A CPA is doing a final review of a client’s tax returns, as prepared by an associate. As with many business owners, the client has two related entities, one acting as the management company for the other.

The reviewing partner notices the income from management fees in one entity, but no corresponding expense deduction in the other. The associate explains that the client’s books didn’t show the offsetting expense, so he ignored it.

The owner of an IT services company receives an irate call from a client. His technician has just spent two billable hours on the client’s PC, and it still won’t print his documents.

When the employee is asked for an explanation, he points out that the client said he needed updates to his printer drivers, and that is exactly what he (the technician) did. At no point did he try to determine whether updating the drivers would solve the customer’s problem, or even what that problem was.

The customer made a request, and the technician complied. He didn’t perceive the customer’s lack of technical knowledge as a factor.

As the adage goes, “When someone asks you for a drill, what he really wants is a hole.” If you are in any business where the customer expects you to be more knowledgeable than him (and why would he hire you otherwise?) thinking is a core competency.

I Can Look Up the Answer

Numerous educators and managers have related to me the effect of the Internet. Students resist rote learning. Employees refuse to train in procedures. Their answer is ubiquitous; “Why do I have to know that? I can look it up whenever I need it.”

In some circles, gaining “knowledge” is a game of speed and skill. Participants in a conversation whip out their electronic lozenges upon any reference to a historical fact, person or thing name, geography question, et al, ad infinitum. (Don’t know Latin? No problem. Google it.)

What is eroding is the concept that an answer may not be the best answer, or even a good answer. It’s just an answer.

Life isn’t “Fill In the Blanks”

Getting an answer doesn’t mean you’ve solved a problem. What we are losing is the ability for critical thinking. For saying “Wait a minute. That is one approach, but might there be others? Is there a better answer?”

We used to have to work through that step by step in our brains. Now we are becoming conditioned to accepting the answer on a little screen as the final word.  It’s great for learning how to change a faucet, but maybe not so hot for solving a customer complaint.

Your management team is the most important factor in realizing value for your business.  If you are planning a fully controlled (time, method, and proceeds) internal transition, they are your buyers and the guarantors of any financing you may underwrite. If you are selling to an external buyer, he or she wants to see a business capable of running (and making good decisions) without you.

Either way, you need to teach them how to think.

Invest 15 Minutes and take our FREE Exit Readiness Assessment. We do not request any confidential information.

John F. Dini develops transition and succession strategies that allow business owners to exit their companies on their own schedule, with the proceeds they seek and complete control over the process. He takes a coaching approach to client engagements, focusing on helping owners of companies with $1M to $250M in revenue achieve both their desired lifestyles and legacies

What’s Wrong with the Buyer Generations?

by

Many of the upcoming buyer generations can’t or won’t run Baby Boomer businesses. This is (or should be) of concern to sellers everywhere.

“The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households.” Attributed to Socrates by Plato.

Elders have been complaining about their offspring for 2,500 years. The complaints change only in the activity bemoaned. “Chatter in place of exercise” is replaced by those damn radios, or automobiles, or television, or rock’n’roll, or cell phones or texting. It’s amazing when you realize that we’ve somehow managed to thrive through eons of generational deterioration.

The Buyer Generations

But one thing is true. Generation X and the Millennials are not attracted, as a group, to many of the businesses run by Baby Boomers. We’ve discussed the macroeconomic trends, demographics, sociographics and psychographics, at length in this column and in my latest book Your ExitMap: Navigating the Boomer Bust.

For the next few columns, we’ll talk about other forces that deplete the number of available and interested buyers, and what you as a seller can do about them. Note that I said “deplete” the number. An attendee at one of my presentations a few weeks ago raised his hand during Q&A and said “There will always be someone willing to buy a profitable business.”

That is probably true, but in any competitive sales situation the challenge is to find and attract a qualified buyer. Most of us do that by targeting our offerings to the buyers we seek, then making certain they are aware of what we are selling. The buyers we seek are those who are willing and able to pay the price we ask. In other words, we play the odds. What we are discussing here is finding willing buyers who are able to pay your asking price.

Regulatory Obstacles

One issue in selling your business is the regulatory environment. Since the 1970’s, Americans have come to accept that basic business qualifications should be legislated. Some 30% of all products and services now require some form of government permission (licenses or certifications) to operate.

When the owner of a business is the sole qualified practitioner for its offerings, he or she has a problem. Selling the business requires either continuing to work in it personally until a new owner is legally qualified, or providing licensed employees with some insurance for the new owner of their retention. (See our column on Stay Bonuses.)

This issue drives many owners’ decision to sell the business to qualified employees. You can include a few licensed practitioners in an ownership group, frequently combining them with non-licensed managers or executives who are more suited to running operations. With a few years of advance planning, an owner can exit with the sale price in hand on the day he or she gives up control.

To be blunt, if you are the only person legally capable of creating, presenting or approving the work of your company, you have a job more than a business. The first step in preparing a saleable enterprise is to make sure it can operate without you.

Employee Retention Before and After Your Exit

by

In most businesses, employee retention is a material factor in valuation and transferability.

The ability of a buyer to assume control of a fully-functional organization has substantial influence on his or her perception of a company’s value. Any need to pay the seller for an extended period of training adds a redundant executive salary to the projected operating costs. Concern that key personnel may resign or be recruited away by a competitor adds a level of uncertainty to the transfer.

Of course, the basic premise of “The more you work in the business, the less it is worth.” always applies. Even if you’ve effectively delegated most of your operational responsibilities, however,  there remains the threat of an exodus of corporate knowledge.

Many exiting owners don’t believe that the problem is theirs. “These people work for me because I treat them well.” they say. “A new owner should have no problem if he or she does the same.”

True enough, but every buyer’s confidence level is greatly increased by a mechanism to support employee retention through the transfer process.

Stay Bonuses

Stay bonuses are so named (quite logically) because their purpose is to get key employees to stick around after a transfer of leadership. They can take a number of forms, but one of the most common is to escrow a portion of the sale proceeds for later payment if certain conditions are met.

The amount of the bonus can vary, but a general rule of thumb is about six months’ salary for two years of continued employment. Depending on the deal and the number of employees involved, this could be substantial. We suggest allocating about 5% of the sale price when planning such bonuses, but it could vary widely. Here are a few examples.

You sell your company for $5,000,000. Your four top executives each earn $200,000 a year. Six months of their salaries would be $200,000, or 4% of the sale.

On the other hand, if you have seven top executives at that level, $350,000 is 7% of your sale proceeds. That might be too rich a commission for your taste. The 5% guideline would make their bonuses about $35,000 or about 18% of salary.

Only you can decide whether the amount is motivational. Differing amounts based on position are normal. There is no requirement (such as in ERISA) that you apportion the funds by longevity or salary level.

Conditions of Payment

If you choose to make the bonus available, it only enhances the buyer’s confidence. Because the bonus is the seller’s liability, the new employer has no added financial motivation to keep or terminate any particular individual.

Bonuses are customarily forfeited upon resignation or termination for cause. Unlike other non-qualified deferred compensation plans, bonuses are typically not paid out in the event of the employee’s death or disability. This isn’t synthetic equity or a reward for general tenure. Qualification for payment is dependent on a specific condition being met at a specific time.

Also, unlike most NQDC plans, there is no buildup or gradual vesting of value. An employee who stays for 18 months isn’t eligible for three-quarters of a bonus. That should make stay bonuses free of claims in the event of an employee’s bankruptcy or divorce.

Employee Retention Alternatives

Employee retention is an issue in the transfer of any business with skilled personnel.  Only you can determine whether it is worth the investment of offering stay bonuses.

If you are confident in employees’ loyalty to the company, one alternative is to place some of the sale price into an escrow account, to be released if turnover remains below a certain percentage for a specific time. This still allows you to retain the entire proceeds, but transfers some of the financial risk of turnover (even for non employment-related causes) to you.

The other approach is to rely on inertia and security to maintain your workforce in place. Those are strong motivations, and are sufficient in most cases.

Regardless of a buyer’s demands, remember that no one gave you financial guarantees of loyalty. You earned it, and it isn’t unreasonable to expect a buyer to do the same.

Celebrating Mr. Fezziwig

by

To celebrate the holiday, I’m reprinting a post from 2013 about the underappreciated boss of A Christmas Carol, Mr. Fezziwig. I hope that you enjoy it. Merry Christmas!

Last week was the 170th anniversary of the publication of Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol (December 17, 1843). The immortal words of Ebenezer Scrooge are ingrained in the memory of the entire English speaking world. I’d venture to guess that “Bah, Humbug!” can be correctly identified as to source and speaker by over 99% of those reading this.

The novella, serialized in five parts, was not a commercial success. Unhappy with the sales of his previous novel (Martin Chuzzlewit– no wonder!), he refused his normal fee from the publisher in favor of royalties on the proceeds, which proved disappointing. Critical reception was favorable, although it didn’t catch on in America until much later. The New York Times first published a review in 1863, 20 years after its publication in England.

Like most of Dickens’ work, A Christmas Carol clearly includes an indictment of the social inequalities of the Industrial Age; child labor, workhouses, and debtors’ prisons. It stands out, however, because of the lessons taught by its memorable ghosts, and the redemption of its main character in only 113 pages.

During the Protestant Reformation in England and Scotland, Christmas had become a period of penance and reflection. A Christmas Carol is credited by many for leading the return to a celebratory holiday, focused on appreciation and thanks for family and friends.

Modern Ebenezers

Modern filmmakers have returned to the straight-ahead plot and uplifting story line (not to mention the recurring revenues available year after year) with a frequency that helps stamp the legend in our psyche. Starting with the 1938 Reginald Owen version (originally released as “Scrooge”) and the 1951 Alistair Sim classic, the character of Ebenezer has been tackled by actors ranging from George C. Scott to Michael Caine (with the Muppets). Patrick Stewart, Kelsey Grammar and Rich Little (in various celebrity impersonations) have taken a shot, as have Mickey Mouse, Mr. Magoo, the Smurfs, Barbie, Dora the Explorer and the Flintstones.

Let’s not forget the variants; Bill Murray in “Scrooged”, or Boris Karloff and Jim Carrey in versions of “How the Grinch Stole Christmas.” In all, IMDB lists almost 200 filmed variants of the story.

Unfortunately, the characterization of Scrooge has become ingrained in the minds of many as a stereotype of all bosses who dare to focus on margins and profit. How many employees identify their bosses with Fezziwig, who took pride in making his employees a happy group, even though Scrooge dismissed it as “only a little thing?”

FezziwigInstead of focusing on  the things that allow Fezziwig to spend lavishly on his employees (a motivated workforce, honesty, doing what’s right, profitability), we prefer to fantasize about a boss who expresses sudden enlightenment by unexpectedly bestowing gifts and extra days off. Fezziwig is relegated to an afterthought, an overweight doting uncle with no visible reason for his success.

Most of us are far more Fezziwigs than Scrooges. Oddly, if we celebrated the season of giving by handing our employees a list of all the extra things we’ve done for them during the year, we’d be considered more akin to Ebenezer. We bow to the popular myth, give even more at the holidays, and hope it has some carryover of appreciation into the New Year.

Just remember to remind your employees when you are being Fezziwig the rest of the year. A Christmas turkey for Tiny Tim isn’t as important as being a good boss.