Exit Planning Tools for Business Owners

Selling to Employees: Exit Planning for Small Business Part 4

Selling to employees is one method of transition that is growing rapidly in popularity. Usually the  driving motivation is a desire to help the people who got you this far enjoy some of the benefits of ownership, but there is a substantial list of other benefits.

  1. Pricing is agreed at the start, not in adversarial negotiations.
  2. Valuation is flexible. The business can be sold for more or less than its Fair Market Value, as long as both sides agree and cash flow supports it.
  3. The legacy of the business lives on in the community.
  4. Where there are substantial challenges to an outside buyer, such as industries whpiere work goes to the lowest bidder, employees are more confident that they can succeed in the system.
  5. Financing is built into the transition plan.

(By the way, if you are just picking up this series now, prior topics included strategies that aren’t suited to small business, selling to a third party, and selling to family.)

“But they have no money!”

That’s the most frequent objection when we suggest an employee sale, but it is easily remedied by time. In fact, time and risk are corollaries. The more time you have, the less risk you’ll take. Faster is riskier.

At one end of the spectrum we’ll say you want to exit the business in the next thirty to sixty days. That’s probably enough time to draw up a purchase agreement and transfer ownership. The payment for the business would be entirely in an installment note from your workers. Rapid exit, but maximum probability that you will never see the entire purchase price.

On the other hand, what if you have five to ten years for selling to employees?  You could sell stock for a note, and let employees pay for their shares with bonuses based on increasing profitability. They are motivated to grow the company, while you continue to receive all the profits you were due anyway.

As they increase their ownership, they can qualify for lender financing to purchase your equity. Done well, and with enough time, you can realize the full value of the business and increase your short-term income along the way. Time gives you lower risk, and the potential for higher reward.

Are they qualified?

That is another question entirely and one that depends largely on you. If you’ve hired the right people and trained them well, selling to employees is a breeze. If you are the center of everything that happens in your business, it could be a problem.

Remember, the more you work in your business the less it is worth. To see how dependent your business is on you, take the quiz at www.ownercentricity.com.

What if they are willing and able, but not ready? Or perhaps you have a few key managers, but they lack some critical skill sets? Again, time gives you the flexibility to deal with those issues.

You may not have anyone who could ever run the business. Again, with suffcient time, you can “hire your buyer.” I’ve seen businesses where an owner used the promise of ownership to recruit someone whom he’d never attract otherwise.

Selling to employees is the ultimate exit plan in your level of control over the process, determining how much you want from the transaction, and choosing your date of departure. If you haven’t considered it in your list of options, you might want to think again.

New! The affordable exit planning system for small business. 9 modules, 9 online tools and completion in 90 days. Take a look at ExitMap® Express!

Exiting a Small Business Part 1

Owners who are exiting a small business are often stymied by the range of choices in exit planning. Most literature on the topic discusses seven or eight avenues to exit.

A sale to a third party can be to an entrepreneur, private equity (including family offices,)  or a strategic acquirer. Internal sales can be to family, or employees via  a Leveraged Buy-Out (LBO- often called a Management Buy-Out or MBO.) There is also a sale to an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) or the oldest method in the book, closing down the company.

While the jargon is appealing to those advisors who want to sound smart, most of it doesn’t apply to the 90% of owners who have fewer than 20 employees. For those owners, about half of those options aren’t realistic. Here’s why (or why not.)

Exits That Don’t Apply to Small Business

Strategic acquirers, as the term suggests, seek a strategic addition to their business. Very few small companies have exclusive rights to a product or territory. Even fewer have proprietary intellectual property (patents or software.) In fact, if you have less than 20 employees the odds are you do about the same thing as several competitors in your own geographic area. No strategic value there.

Private Equity Groups and Family Offices have a fiduciary responsibility to their investor/owners. The level of due diligence needed to protect their interests makes a small transaction hard to support. They traditionally look for companies with more than $1,000,000 of cash flow after owner compensation, and many will only consider two or three times that amount. That’s too rarefied a level for most businesses with a dozen employees.

ESOPs are a great transfer vehicle, but until they loosen the regulatory environment (some laws are being proposed) they usually cost several hundreds of thousands of dollars to complete, and another $50,000 or more for annual compliance thereafter. Too rich for most small businesses.

When I say “small business,” I mean one with five or more employees. Smaller than that usually describes one person with some helpers. That’s more like a job, and closing is often the only avenue to exit.

Exits That Do Apply to Small Business

So, when exiting a small business with between five and twenty employees, you have three choices left. Sell to another individual, to your employees, or your family. If you don’t have family in the business, your choices become even simpler. You can flip a coin, but even for small business owners exiting is usually a major financial event. It’s still worth putting some time and energy into planning.

Over the next few weeks, I’ll discuss the three avenues for exiting a small business. Stay tuned.

Invest 15 Minutes and take our FREE Exit Readiness Assessment. We do not request any confidential information.

John F. Dini develops transition and succession strategies that allow business owners to exit their companies on their own schedule, with the proceeds they seek and complete control over the process. He takes a coaching approach to client engagements, focusing on helping owners of companies with $1M to $250M in revenue achieve both their desired lifestyles and legacies

Manage Activities; Lead for Results

A few weeks ago I posted a comment in the Business Journals Leadership Trust Forum about a life lesson I learned. The difference between effort and outcomes – Manage Activities; Lead for Results.

They reached out and asked if I could expand my comments a bit. Those of you who know me won’t find it surprising that it grew into an article.

You can find it here. I hope you enjoy it. Remember, lead for results.

 
Invest 15 Minutes and take our FREE Exit Readiness Assessment. We do not request any confidential information.

John F. Dini develops transition and succession strategies that allow business owners to exit their companies on their own schedule, with the proceeds they seek and complete control over the process. He takes a coaching approach to client engagements, focusing on helping owners of companies with $1M to $250M in revenue achieve both their desired lifestyles and legacies

Is Google Making Us Stoopid?

As an Exit Planner, most of my engagements involve assessing a management team. They may be the intended buyers of the company, or else they are key factors in the saleability of the business.

The biggest and most frequent complaint I hear about managers is that they don’t know how to THINK. Business owners lament the inability of employees to discern critical paths, assess alternatives, or analyze complex problems.

Examples of Thinking Shortfalls

A CPA is doing a final review of a client’s tax returns, as prepared by an associate. As with many business owners, the client has two related entities, one acting as the management company for the other.

The reviewing partner notices the income from management fees in one entity, but no corresponding expense deduction in the other. The associate explains that the client’s books didn’t show the offsetting expense, so he ignored it.

The owner of an IT services company receives an irate call from a client. His technician has just spent two billable hours on the client’s PC, and it still won’t print his documents.

When the employee is asked for an explanation, he points out that the client said he needed updates to his printer drivers, and that is exactly what he (the technician) did. At no point did he try to determine whether updating the drivers would solve the customer’s problem, or even what that problem was.

The customer made a request, and the technician complied. He didn’t perceive the customer’s lack of technical knowledge as a factor.

As the adage goes, “When someone asks you for a drill, what he really wants is a hole.” If you are in any business where the customer expects you to be more knowledgeable than him (and why would he hire you otherwise?) thinking is a core competency.

I Can Look Up the Answer

Numerous educators and managers have related to me the effect of the Internet. Students resist rote learning. Employees refuse to train in procedures. Their answer is ubiquitous; “Why do I have to know that? I can look it up whenever I need it.”

In some circles, gaining “knowledge” is a game of speed and skill. Participants in a conversation whip out their electronic lozenges upon any reference to a historical fact, person or thing name, geography question, et al, ad infinitum. (Don’t know Latin? No problem. Google it.)

What is eroding is the concept that an answer may not be the best answer, or even a good answer. It’s just an answer.

Life isn’t “Fill In the Blanks”

Getting an answer doesn’t mean you’ve solved a problem. What we are losing is the ability for critical thinking. For saying “Wait a minute. That is one approach, but might there be others? Is there a better answer?”

We used to have to work through that step by step in our brains. Now we are becoming conditioned to accepting the answer on a little screen as the final word.  It’s great for learning how to change a faucet, but maybe not so hot for solving a customer complaint.

Your management team is the most important factor in realizing value for your business.  If you are planning a fully controlled (time, method, and proceeds) internal transition, they are your buyers and the guarantors of any financing you may underwrite. If you are selling to an external buyer, he or she wants to see a business capable of running (and making good decisions) without you.

Either way, you need to teach them how to think.

Invest 15 Minutes and take our FREE Exit Readiness Assessment. We do not request any confidential information.

John F. Dini develops transition and succession strategies that allow business owners to exit their companies on their own schedule, with the proceeds they seek and complete control over the process. He takes a coaching approach to client engagements, focusing on helping owners of companies with $1M to $250M in revenue achieve both their desired lifestyles and legacies

Ambiguity Kills Value

Ambiguity kills value. That was a key point in a white paper from Orange Kiwi that I read over the holidays. Taken from the PhD thesis of Dr. Allie Taylor, the paper describes the psychological profile of  entrepreneurs, and their historical reluctance to begin an exit planning process.

According to Dr. Taylor, entrepreneurs have five major behavioral traits; Risk Taking, Innovativeness, Need for Achievement, tolerance for Ambiguity and a locus for Control. This follows closely my description of the mind of an entrepreneur in Hunting in a Farmer’s World. In that book I discuss the traits of tenacious problem solving and the ability to navigate in the fog.

Ambiguity and Dopamine

That ability to choose a path where others don’t see a way forward is key to a business owner’s ability to stomach risk. What Dr. Taylor points out, however, is that some owners fall in love with their own tolerance for ambiguity. As Simon Sinek points out in Leaders Eat Last (and I also discuss in Hunting,) problem solving provides an owner with a little shot of Dopamine dozens, or even scores of times daily.

Dopamine is the same neurotransmitter that drives substance abuse. In very real terms, an owner’s need for regular dopamine titillations can make decision making addictive. Anticipating a life without the business can subconsciously create a fear of life without the business.  

That’s why owners are reluctant to discuss exit planning. Despite the obvious wisdom of controlling the most important financial event of a lifetime, the personal void that lies beyond ownership is scary. As with many other potentially unpleasant things, from going to the dentist to funeral prearrangements, it’s easy to deal with it…later.

Ambiguity Kills Value

The problem with embracing ambiguity too much is that it can damage your business. Management by firefighting is costly. As Abraham Lincoln said, “If I had eight hours to cut down a tree, I’d spend seven of those sharpening my saw,” Fixing problems almost always costs more than preventing them. Dealing with distractions reduces the time you have available for selling, creating or teaching.

Avoiding the uncomfortable task of exit planning leaves you much more likely to deal with it in response to one of the Dismal D’s. (Death, Disease, Disability, Divorce, Declining sales, Dissention among owners, Debt, Distraction, Disaster or Disinterest.) That’s when the value of your most important asset, a thriving business, starts to plummet.

We all like a bit of ambiguity. Our decision making abilities are what makes us successful owners. Exit planning should be a process of gathering information about your possible decisions, not a ticking clock controlling your future.

Embracing Your Options

Whether you plan to eventually sell your business to a third party, pass it on to family or create a transfer to employees, you still want to assess your financial performance compared to industry standards. Your management team needs to be able to run the company without you. Your processes should be well documented. Most importantly, you should be thinking about what you will do when those hits of decision-making dopamine stop coming.

Once you have the components in place, you can control the timing, proceeds and method of your transition. Until then, you are just waiting for ambiguity to bite you in the butt.

How prepared are you? Take the ExitMap® preparedness Assessment at www.YourExitMap.com