Exit Planning Tools for Business Owners

Exit Options

Key Man Policies May Not Cover a Buy/Sell Agreement

by

Over the last few weeks, I’ve had a number of conversations with clients about key man insurance. Let me say at the outset that I don’t sell insurance, and have no financial stake in whether any client has coverage or not. The use of such policies, however, may not always fit their intended purpose, especially in smaller companies.

The most common intended purpose of a key man policy is to fund a buy/sell agreement. The benefit payment goes to the company, which in turn uses the proceeds to purchase ownership from the family or estate of the deceased. If it works that way, it’s an excellent planning tool for your family’s security, but there are a number of things that can get in the way.

To begin, the company probably needs the money. If they are scrambling to replace you in the business, partners may be reluctant to part with a cash windfall that can keep them going. In most cases, the insurance company’s responsibility ends when payment is made. The buy/sell is a separate agreement, and enforcing it may require legal action by the bereaved family. In the meantime, the cash is being used elsewhere.

Surprisingly, some policies are in place to buy out a sole owner. A company can’t own all of it’s own stock. Someone else has to have at least minimum ownership, since treasury stock (repurchased by the company) has no voting power. If the buy/sell was put in place for former partners, you may want to revisit both the shareholder agreement and the policy.

DominosFinally, there is the small matter of company debt. The absence of the principle credit guarantor (which applies to most majority owners) will trigger repayment clauses. Lenders are in the business of mitigating loan risk, and credit agreements likely give them first call on any available funds. Unless the company remains on a strong footing, with another guarantor who can step into the primary role, the insurance payout might not be available to either the heirs or the business.

There’s one additional area where the objectives of a key man policy and a buy/sell agreement may not meet. That is in long-term disability. Because most buy/sells lump repurchase terms for death and disability together, many owners forget that the insurance only pays in the first event, and has nothing to do with the second.

There are many approaches to obtaining coverage to secure your family’s financial well-being and/or the sustainability of your business. Although I’m an exit planner, that world of split premiums, whole and universal life, insurance trusts and other, far more arcane structures makes my head spin. All I can advise is if your current broker advertises “auto/home/life” he is not likely the kind of specialist you need. Find someone who is experienced in reviewing shareholder or partnership agreements, and who can tailor a product for your requirements.

Thanks to all the readers who responsed to last week’s survey on energy costs. Just under 69% said either “Falling energy prices are good for my business” or “rising energy prices are bad for my business.”  Of course, 14% said the opposite, which just proves my point.

What is Your Company Worth? II

by

Last week we discussed how business owners frequently use hearsay or incomplete information to estimate the value of their companies. They give the number to their financial planner, or include it on a personal financial statement for their banker, neither of whom bat an eyelash at the estimate. Having the amount “accepted” by financial experts, the owner starts to treat it as fact. How do you know whether it is realistic or achievable?

alchemistValuation of a small business is a combination of art and science. No two small companies are alike. A multiple of profits or cash flow is only the starting point. Take two small companies, each with $4,000,000 in revenues and $500,000 in profits. Each pays the same salary and benefits to the owner. One does it by having systems that control most day to day activities, recurring revenue from contracts, and long-term employees who are incented by profit sharing. The other does it with an owner who works 70 hours a week, hasn’t had a two week vacation in ten years, and makes every new sale personally. Which business would you pay more to own?

Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. The multiples paid for businesses depend on the type of buyers they attract. Commonly, those that sell for less than $2,000,000 are considered “Main Street.” Their target buyers are individuals who are purchasing an income. They intend to work in the business, and to earn a regular paycheck by running it.

Main Street businesses are valued by a multiple of Seller’s Discretionary Earnings (SDE). The value of the business is based on the sum of the financial benefits resulting from ownership. That includes profits, salary, benefits and any of a long list of possible perquisites like a company car, travel, or insurance. (For more on calculating your SDE and selling a business in general, you can read my book, 11 Things You Absolutely Need to Know about Selling Your Business.)

Main Street pricing is typically between 2.1 and 2.8 times SDE. It is based on simple arithmetic. The closer you come to 3 times SDE, the less able a buyer is to pay both the bank and himself. You can run your own numbers here, to see how it works (registration required).

For larger companies, those that attract financial and industry acquirers, the multiples are higher, but the multiplier is lower. Those buyers anticipate paying for professional management, so the owner’s compensation is less of a consideration. They look at EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) to calculate available cash after all the expenses of running the business (including executive talent) are paid.

Competitors will calculate the savings they might realize from consolidation, but are usually reluctant to multiply those savings in a purchase price. Private Equity Groups (there are 7,000 in the US) and the acquisition arms of large companies seldom look at businesses with earnings of less than $1,000,000. As amazing as it seems to a small business owner, their due diligence and legal processes are too expensive to make smaller acquisitions worthwhile.

Private Equity Groups pay an average between 4.7 and 5.2 times EBITDA, year in and year out. That makes sense, because they are financial buyers with a targeted Return On Investment (ROI). Large company acquisitions of smaller businesses can range from 4 times EBITA up to around 7 or 8, although in a few cases strategic considerations (competition, exclusive contracts, proprietary methods) can drive that up substantially .

All of these are real numbers, based on actual sales data and industry surveys. Sellers often confuse the terms revenue and income, or apply EBITDA multiples to SDE. They are greatly disappointed and angry when legitimate offers fall far below their expectations. Just because your planner or your banker didn’t challenge your valuation estimate doesn’t make it fact.

My new book, Hunting in a Farmer’s World: Celebrating the Mind of an Entrepreneur, is now available on Amazon in paperback, hardcover and Kindle. It is an ownership book, not a management book, and is illustrated with the stories of real entrepreneurs who faced challenges that apply to us all.

The Gen X Business Buyer

by

Generation X’ers aren’t mini-Boomers. Raised in a rapidly growing economy by parents that approached child rearing as a competitive activity, they saw more, did more, and were given more than their parents could have dreamed of.

I took my first commercial airline ride when I was 25 years old (and before my mother’s first flight). My two sons had each boarded planes over 50 times before they were in high school.

I was not an athlete, and have no hardware to display testifying to any athletic prowess. My youngest son made varsity in one sport, for one year. Yet he has a bookcase full of trophies.

I received a couple of piano lessons from a neighbor who played. My children had paid instructors for martial arts, gymnastics, baseball, piano, viola, singing, and math. They are far from the most-coached kids I know.

The challenge of selling a business to a small and disinclined group of prospective buyers starts with their lack of numbers, but it is just as much about how they were raised by their Boomer parents. Generation X has different values and many more choices.

Values

The numbers are just the most obvious (and the most inevitable) factor impacting Generation X as buyers. The second factor is values. Every Boomer owner I know, and there are hundreds, has complained about the expectations and the lack of a decent work ethic among Generation X. This isn’t caused by a special laziness gene. It is a matter of values.

Boomer “super parents,” driven by their competitive  approach to everything, raised children who expected to be accepted for who they are, and to have things done for them. Boomers created the children’s ball team where everyone got a trophy just for participating, regardless of the team’s success. X’ers watched their parents struggle with a breakneck pace and the concept of work-life balance and, like every generation of offspring, saw their parents’ approach to life as stupid.

So Generation X, by and large, doesn’t equate material comfort directly with work. Their “balance” is oriented towards separating work and life. Unlike most Boomers, who live to work, the X generation only works to live. Work isn’t their identity, it is merely the thing that permits them to finance what they really want to be.

For Boomer entrepreneurs, who accept a 50 or 60 hour work week as simply part of the cost of business ownership, that isn’t good news. The next generation of buyers doesn’t agree with you, and isn’t interested in subordinating their lives to the quest for success.

Choices

I know five local CPA firms that have sold to regional or national competitors in the last 3 years or so. Each had the same problem. They had built a model where the retirement of the Boomer founders was dependent on the profits to be generated by the next generation of partners. Unfortunately, that generation wasn’t interested in assuming the required work load. In several of the cases, a younger partner was invited to a meeting, where the senior partners announced that he or she had been selected as the next leader of the firm. To their shock, the annointee turned them down flat.

Corporate America is aware of the coming shortage of educated, hard-working, middle-aged executives. They are recruiting them with far greater benefits and perquisites than a small business can afford.

Since the 1970’s, a flood of regulation and increasing liability connected to business ownership makes the entrepreneurial proposition riskier and more tedious. The Boomers have only themselves to thank for that.

The retirement of the Boomers is placing a crushing burden on Medicare, Social Security and pension funds. The likelihood of greater taxation, and lower benefits for those who follow, detracts from the attraction of working hard to make a lot more money.

Finally, technology has vastly expanded Gen X’s choices. Flex time, telecommuting, job sharing, family leave and home-based businesses make the traditional model of sitting in a business all day look far less appealing.

The bleakest future is for a small business that has few factors, other than the owner’s personal reputation, to differentiate it from its competitors. It depends on the ongoing efforts of its owner to produce revenue. It has a number of employees who are only trained on the job, or who possess few distinctive skills that make them an integrated part of the business. It has no incentives that lock the best performers into long term relationships.  It lacks middle management, or anyone who can run the business indefinitely without the owner around to make decisions.

If that describes the business you own, it is time to start making changes. The generation that is reaching business-buying age has more choices for earning a living, and many more choices that better fit their values.

This series is focused on Boomers who are preparing to exit their businesses. For owners who precede the Boomers (currently in their 70’s), there is still a market of younger Boomers (in their late 40s and early 50s) to sell to. We are describing a problem that is only going to accelerate in the next 5 years. It is unavoidable, and the numbers are irrefutable.

There is some good news. You can do something about it. Most small business owners will remain oblivious to the realities of the market until they try to sell, and even then probably won’t understand the reasons why they can’t.

Like the hiker running from the bear, you don’t have to be faster than the bear. You just need to be faster than the other hiker. Simply reading this puts you ahead of the pack. We next turn our attention to what it will take to successfully exit your business in the toughest selling market in history.

Picture Credit

(This is the seventh installment in a series about “Beating the Boomer Bust.” Previous installments are The Approaching Tidal Wave, The Pig in the Python,  The Brass Ring, Work-Life Balance, Outsourcing America and The X Factor.)

 

The X Factor

by

There are two sides to every business transaction, a buyer and a seller. For most of the last 50 years in America, the Baby Boomers have been the biggest buyers in history. They bought homes and cars to spur the economy after World War II. They bought franchises to provide services for each other as busy parents. They bought SUVs and McMansions when they became the affluent middle-aged.

Squeezed out of a corporate America that didn’t have room for them, and couldn’t offer the clear path to success they had been raised to expect, the Boomers formed new businesses in numbers unmatched before or since.

In 1975, when the first Boomers turned 30 years old, there were 300,000 new business formations in the United States. By 1986 when those same Boomers were 41, we saw almost 750,000 new businesses open, a number 250% larger than just 10 years before.

Just as importantly, by 1990 the rate of new business openings had dropped back to 600,000. It has remained at roughly 600,000 ever since, despite that fact that the national population has grown by almost 65,000,000 people since then (from 249 million in 1990 to over 313 million in 2010).

Boomers didn’t just open a lot of businesses because of their sheer numbers, although that was part of it. They opened them because the had been raised with greater expectations than previous generations. Their values focused on material evidence of success, combined with a powerful attachment to a workplace persona. Subsequent generations have not embraced business ownership like the Boomers did.

But in 2010 the first Boomers began turning 65, and a generation that has driven the American economy by buying feverishly is about to turn into sellers. It won’t happen all at once. Improved health care, technology, their value on work roles and a fairly dismal record of saving will all combine to keep the Boomers in the workplace longer than their parents. But sell they will, and soon they will be bringing a massive wave of small businesses to market.

The buyers are Generation X, the youngest of whom were just turning 25 years old as the first Boomers hit 65. Generation X as a term has been used in various ways as early as 1964 to describe disaffected adolescents, to describe all 20-somethings, and to specifically cover those born between 1960 and 1965 (note that several of these uses are actually about Boomers). My preferred definition is the tenth generation since 1776 born as citizens of the United States (Roman Numeral X).

This generation, beginning with the babies of 1965 and continuing through 1984, is a big problem for Boomers who are preparing to sell their businesses. The issues are three-fold: numbers, values and choices.

We will first discuss the numbers, since they are the most powerful argument for what is to come. We cannot change the birthrates of 40, 50 or 60 years ago. All the people who were born between 1945 and 1964 are born. There will not be any less of them. Those born between 1965 and 1984 are the same, there won’t be any more.

This is a deep dive into the statistics. It may be a bit tedious for some folks, but it is critical to understanding the scope and impact of the problem.

Numbers

Even on the face of it, the numbers aren’t favorable for the Boomers who will be selling their companies. The X’ers number about 69 million in total, around 9 million, or 11%, fewer than the Boomers. That may not sound like a lot, but think about how profitable your business would be with 11% fewer sales.

Eleven percent of any market is a chunk. If your market is the entire United States of today, taking 11% off the table would mean removing Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Wyoming and Virginia. Those aren’t minor markets. (Well, maybe Wyoming, but I needed to make the numbers come out.)

Most markets aren’t the entire country, however. Starting with the Boomers as children, Marketers have increasingly segmented and targeted age groups for their products. Shrinking a target market by 11% means fewer prospects to sell to, and small businesses for sale will simply have fewer prospective buyers.

The impact is even more dramatic when the curve of births is examined. Boomer births peaked in 1957 at 4.3 million. Gen X births declined steadily from 1965 through 1973, when only 3.1 million, babies, 28% fewer than in the peak Boomer year, were born. For the period from 1953 through 1957 almost 21 million Boomers were born. For 1973 through 1977 there were just under 16 million new X’ers.

That means from 2018 through 2022, when those babies hit 65 years old, almost 5 million fewer people (23%) will be turning 45, and entering their prime business buying years. What would your market look like with 23% fewer buyers? What happens to pricing and competition when you start with 3 buyers for every 4 sellers?

We are rapidly approaching the worst imbalance between small business sellers and buyers in history, and it will continue for the next 20 years.

If the problem was limited to the numbers alone it would still be dramatic. In addition, there are other factors that make the numerical shortfall even more pronounced. The profile of the buyers, the values and the choices of Generation X,  will exponentially increase the gap between Boomer sellers and the people to whom they expect to sell their businesses.

(This is the sixth installment in a series about “Beating the Boomer Bust.” Previous installments are The Approaching Tidal Wave, The Pig in the Python,  The Brass Ring, Work-Life Balance and Outsourcing America.)

The (pen)Ultimate Hire

by

Every sane business owner will acknowledge that there is a point at which his or her own skills are no longer sufficient to grow the business beyond its current level. The revenue point where that happens differs by industry, but it frequently begins at around 20 employees.

At that point, an owner becomes swamped by the conflicting needs of managing the existing operation, and having enough time to perform the tasks that made the business grow in the first place.

The owner realizes that further growth requires the addition of a key employee; one who can assume some of the owner’s duties so that he or she can focus on organizational development.

The typical plaint in this situation is “I need someone who can think. An employee who can run things without my daily input, so that I can focus on what I do best.”

But there is another version that is materially different, although it sounds the same on the surface. “I need someone who can run this company without me.” is a far cry from one who can handle day-to-day operating responsibilities.

Many owners fail to look beyond the immediate need for task relief  to determine exactly what this key employee’s long-term role will be. There is a big difference between hiring an SIC (Second In Command) and an SIT (Successor in Training.)

A Second In Command is responsible for assuming some of the owner’s ongoing decision-making and management duties. The SIC’s role is to free the owner to do what he or she is best at (or enjoys the most). The job description is based on the assumption that the owner is present, or at least available, to check off on major decisions and give ongoing guidance.

In my presentation to business owners, “Beating the Boomer Bust” I discuss the likelihood that many owners will have to execute their own succession plan by growing a successor internally. This Successor In Training is more than someone who can merely back fill your skill set. It needs to be someone who can eventually replace your skills in the business.

The common wisdom is that an SIC should compliment, not duplicate, your talents. We advise owners not to hire a “mini-me,” since it is unlikely that you can find someone who has the same motivations to cover all the various skills that ownership requires.

Typically, you take your job description (finance, sales, business development, culture, motivation, operations, marketing, management) and subtract those things that you want to continue doing personally. The rest of the duties become the SIC’s job description.

But the intention of many owners is to develop the SIC into an SIT. An SIT is someone who can eventually assume all of your higher-level duties. He or she has to create value while you are still there by filling in the gaps in your skill set, but must also have the potential to grow into a broader role as you prepare to withdraw from the business.

Of course, you are still in for a long search if you seek a “mini-me.” The likelihood is that your SIT will eventually need an SIC of his or her own. If you can’t run the company by yourself, your successor can’t either. If you need an SIC now who pays closer attention to the numbers and ratios than you do, then that person will eventually need someone to focus on sales and development.

Hiring a key executive is the single most important decision you will make. Don’t begin the process by making the mistake of looking at only the needs you have today. A solid SIC will probably take five years to fully integrate with you. An SIT may take ten. The investment can be wasted if you look only at your immediate needs. Start with a longer-term vision of how you want your role as an owner (or as an ex-owner) to play out.